Briefing
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Key points: In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to; As part of the joint venture agreement, Agnico committed to spend US $7 million on Project expenditures over three years and can earn an additional 15% interest in Gunnarn Mining AB, which owns the Barsele Project, if it; The Company's financial assets are measured at amortized cost and subject to the ECL model; FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to estim; BASIS OF PREPARATION a) Statement of compliance These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies consistent with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the International A; Objective evidence of impairment of equity investment includes: - Significant financial difficulty of the associated companies; - Becoming probable that the associated companies will enter bankruptcy or other financial r. This brief is based on the cited source artifact and is intended as a research entry point, not a replacement for the original source or EGM canonical data tables.
Source Notes
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that...
Extractive summary evidence · source
As part of the joint venture agreement, Agnico committed to spend US $7 million on Project expenditures over three years and can...
Extractive summary evidence 2 · source
The Company's financial assets are measured at amortized cost and subject to the ECL model.
Extractive summary evidence 3 · source
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value...
Extractive summary evidence 4 · source
Extracted Document Text
This is a readable excerpt of the EGM normalized Markdown text. It helps search engines and researchers understand PDF, filing, or company-document content while the original source remains authoritative.
# Financial Statements Q4 2025 (Audited) Source: https://goldskyresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Goldsky_FS_Q4_2025_final-for-filing.pdf Fetched: 2026-09-12T07:02:23.679+00:00 Source artifact: 66d8a2a7-1bbc-4c52-9c26-583384cff745 Normalizer input: text ## Content # Financial Statements Q4 2025 (Audited) GOLDSKY RESOURCES CORP. (FORMERLY FIRST NORDIC METALS CORP.) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) DECEMBER 31, 2025 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Shareholders of Goldsky Resources Corp. (formerly First Nordic Metals Corp.) Opinion We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Goldsky Resources Corp. (formerly First Nordic Metals Corp.) (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including material accounting policy information. In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IFRS Accounting Standards). Basis for Opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in Canada, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audit is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Key Audit Matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditor's professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. Assessment of Impairment Indicators of Exploration and Evaluation Assets (“E&E Assets”) As described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying amount of the Company’s E&E Assets was $91,457,429 as of December 31, 2025. As more fully described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, management assesses E&E Assets for indicators of impairment at each reporting period. The principal considerations for our determination that the assessment of impairment indicators of the E&E Assets is a key audit matter are that there was judgment made by management when assessing whether there were indicators of impairment for the E&E Assets, specifically relating to the assets’ carrying amount which is impacted by the Company’s intent and ability to continue to explore and evaluate these assets. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures to evaluate audit evidence relating to the judgments made by management in their assessment of indicators of impairment that could give rise to the requirement to prepare an estimate of the recoverable amount of the E&E Asset. Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Our audit procedures included, among others: • Evaluating management’s assessment of impairment indicators. • Evaluating the intent for the E&E Assets through discussion and communication with management. • Reviewing the Company’s recent expenditure activity and expenditure budgets for future periods. • Assessing compliance with agreements and expenditure requirements including reviewing option agreements and vouching cash payments. • Assessing the Company’s rights to explore E&E Assets including sending a confirmation request to an optionor to ensure good standing of agreements. • Obtaining, on a test basis, confirmation of title to ensure mineral rights underlying the E&E Assets are in good standing. Accounting for the Acquisition of Mawson Finland Limited (“Mawson”) As described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company acquired 100% of Mawson (the “Transaction”) for consideration totalling $75,871,879. As more fully described in Note 2, judgement is required by the Company to assess whether the Transaction constituted a business combination or an asset acquisition. We identified the accounting for the Transaction as a key audit matter in respect of whether the set of assets acquired, and liabilities assumed constituted a business. This matter represented an area of significant risk of material misstatement given the high degree of estimation uncertainty. A high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort were required in performing procedures to evaluate management’s significant judgements in assessing the accounting for the Transaction and the fair value of the assets acquired. Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Our audit procedures included, among others: • Evaluating management’s assessment of whether the Transaction constituted an asset acquisition or business combination. • Examining and evaluating the contractual terms identified in underlying agreements in connection with the Transaction for consistency with the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. • Reviewing and assessing fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on acquisition. • Assessing the adequacy of the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Other Information Management is responsible for the other information. The other information obtained at the date of this auditor's report includes Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. We obtained Management’s Discussion and Analysis prior to the date of this auditor’s report. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process. Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. • Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. • Plan and perform the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Company to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independenc [Excerpt trimmed for readability. Open the original source for the complete filing or document.]
