Briefing
Once technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment and reclassified to mineral properties within property, plant and equipment. d) Mineral properties and property, plant and equipment Mineral properties and property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impair Key points: Once technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment and reclassified to mineral properties within property, p; Such costs include mine development, underground access development, and expenditures directly attributable to accessing mineralized zones, extending mine life, expanding or converting mineral resources and reserves, and; 5 Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 1; 6 Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 2; 7 Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 3; 8 Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 3. This brief is based on the cited source artifact and is intended as a research entry point, not a replacement for the original source or EGM canonical data tables.
Source Notes
Once technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment and...
Extractive summary evidence · source
Such costs include mine development, underground access development, and expenditures directly attributable to accessing mineralized zones, extending mine life, expanding or converting...
Extractive summary evidence 2 · source
5 Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 1.
Extractive summary evidence 3 · source
6 Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 2.
Extractive summary evidence 4 · source
Extracted Document Text
This is a readable excerpt of the EGM normalized Markdown text. It helps search engines and researchers understand PDF, filing, or company-document content while the original source remains authoritative.
# Financial Statements Source: https://lucamining.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Luca-Q4-2025-FS-FINAL.pdf Published: 2026-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 Fetched: 2026-05-12T15:21:36.883+00:00 Source artifact: b9dad9fd-5537-41bc-b969-4816af0f8e8c Normalizer input: text ## Content # Financial Statements Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 KPMG LLP 777 Dunsmuir Street, 11th floor Vancouver, BC V7Y 1K3 Canada Tel 604 691 3000 Fax 604 691 3031 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Shareholders of Luca Mining Corp. Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Luca Mining Corp. (the Entity), which comprise: • the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2025 • the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the year then ended • the consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year then ended • the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended • and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of material accounting policies (Hereinafter referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Entity as at December 31, 2025 and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Basis for Opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements” section of our auditor’s report. We are independent of the Entity in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Canada and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. KPMG LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership and member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. Key Audit Matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our auditor’s report. Evaluation of the fair value of the derivative liability associated with the silver stream agreement with Empress Royalty Corp. Description of the matter We draw attention to Notes 4(b), 15 and 27(a) to the financial statements. On April 14, 2021, the Entity entered into a silver stream agreement (the “Stream Agreement”) with Empress Royalty Corp. (“Empress”). On August 13, 2024, the Entity and Empress amended the Stream Agreement. The Entity has recorded a derivative liability of $53,769 thousand related to the Stream Agreement and a loss on the change in fair value of the derivative liability of $38,935 thousand. The fair value of the Stream Agreement was determined using a discounted cash flow model which included significant assumptions related to the forecasted silver delivery schedule, the future silver price and the discount rate. Why the matter is a key audit matter We identified the evaluation of the fair value of the derivative liability associated with the Stream Agreement as a key audit matter. The matter represented an area of significant risk of material misstatement given the magnitude of the balance and high degree of estimation uncertainty in determining the fair value of the derivative liability. Significant auditor judgment and the involvement of those with specialized skills and knowledge were required in performing and evaluating the results of our procedures due to the sensitivity of the fair value of the derivative liability to changes in significant assumptions. How the matter was addressed in the audit The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this key audit matter: • We compared the mineral resources used in the discounted cash flow model to the mineral resources prepared by independent qualified persons. We assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the qualified persons who prepared the mineral resources, including the industry and regulatory standards they applied. • We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in (1) evaluating the future silver price by comparing it to third party data, and (2) evaluating the discount rate by comparing it to publicly available market data for comparable entities. Comparative Information We draw attention to Note 2(d) to the financial statements (“Note 2(d)”), which explains that certain comparative information presented for the year ended December 31, 2024 has been adjusted. 2 Note 2(d) explains the reason for the adjustment and also explains the adjustments that were applied to the comparative information. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter. The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, excluding the adjustments that were applied to certain comparative information, were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on those financial statements on April 22, 2025. As part of our audit of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, we also audited the adjustments that were applied to certain comparative information presented for the year ended December 31, 2024. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Other than with respect to the adjustments that were applied to certain comparative information, we were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on those financial statements taken as a whole. Other Information Management is responsible for the other information. Other information comprises the information included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not and will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit and remain alert for indications that the other information appears to be materially misstated. We obtained the information included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis as at the date of this auditor’s report. If, based on the work we have performed on this other information, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact in the auditor’s report. We have nothing to report in this regard. Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 3 In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Entity's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Entity's financial reporting process. Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Entity's internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. • Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Entity to cease to continue as a going concern. 4 • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. • Communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. • Provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards. • Plan and perform the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities [Excerpt trimmed for readability. Open the original source for the complete filing or document.]
