Briefing
When the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, the resource properties are no longer classified as resource properties and are tested for impairment prior to their reclassification to development assets. Key points: When the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, the resource properties are no longer classified as resource properties and are tested for impairment prior to th; The determination of discounted cash flows is dependent on a number of factors, including future metal prices, the amount of reserves, the cost of bringing the project into production, production schedules, production co; The value in use of resource properties is generally determined as the present value of future cash flows arising from the continued use of the assets; While the Company is still pursuing further collection, with the delay in processing and uncertainty of collection, management determined that it is appropriate to continue to recognize the VAT receivable, other than kno; The ultimate recoverability of the amounts capitalized for the resource properties is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete their development and realize profitable production or proceeds from the; Functional and presentation currency and foreign currency translation Items included in the consolidated financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operat. This brief is based on the cited source artifact and is intended as a research entry point, not a replacement for the original source or EGM canonical data tables.
Source Notes
When the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, the resource properties are no longer classified as...
Extractive summary evidence · source
The determination of discounted cash flows is dependent on a number of factors, including future metal prices, the amount of reserves, the...
Extractive summary evidence 2 · source
The value in use of resource properties is generally determined as the present value of future cash flows arising from the continued...
Extractive summary evidence 3 · source
While the Company is still pursuing further collection, with the delay in processing and uncertainty of collection, management determined that it is...
Extractive summary evidence 4 · source
Extracted Document Text
This is a readable excerpt of the EGM normalized Markdown text. It helps search engines and researchers understand PDF, filing, or company-document content while the original source remains authoritative.
# FS Source: https://silvertigermetals.com/files/Silver_Tiger_FS_Mar-31-2026_-_Final.pdf Fetched: 2026-09-12T07:09:04.997+00:00 Source artifact: cab49c98-4ae1-4efd-a7b6-d02e4eb3cfae Normalizer input: text ## Content # FS Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2026 and 2025 (expressed in Canadian dollars) June 29, 2026 Management’s Report The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Silver Tiger Metals Inc. (the “Company”) are the responsibility of management and have been approved by the Board of Directors. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS Accounting Standard”). The consolidated financial statements include certain amounts and assumptions that are based on management’s best estimates and have been derived with careful judgment. In fulfilling its responsibilities, management has developed and maintains a system of internal accounting controls. These controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial records are reliable for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed and approved the Company’s consolidated financial statements and recommended their approval by the Board of Directors. (signed) “Glenn Jessome” (signed) “Keith Abriel” President and Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Halifax, Nova Scotia Halifax, Nova Scotia Independent auditor’s report To the Shareholders of Silver Tiger Metals Inc. Our opinion In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Silver Tiger Metals Inc. and its subsidiaries (together, the Company) as at March 31, 2026 and 2025, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IFRS Accounting Standards). What we have audited The Company’s consolidated financial statements comprise: • the consolidated statements of financial position as at March 31, 2026 and 2025; • the consolidated statements of changes in equity for the years then ended; • the consolidated statements of net loss and comprehensive loss for the years then ended; • the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years then ended; and • the notes to the consolidated financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements section of our report. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Cogswell Tower, 2000 Barrington Street, Suite 1101 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 3K1 T.: +1 902 491 7400, F.: +1 902 422 1166 Fax to mail: ca_halifax_main_fax@pwc.com “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Independence We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in Canada. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2026. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter Assessment of indicators of impairment of resource Our approach to addressing the matter included the following properties procedures, among others: Refer to note 2 – Basis of presentation, note 3 – Material • Assessed the judgment applied by management in accounting policies and note 7 – Resource properties to the determining the indicators of impairment, which included consolidated financial statements. the following: The carrying amount of resource properties was $90,691,258 − Obtained, for all claims, by reference to government as at March 31, 2026. At the end of each reporting period, registries, evidence to support (i) the right to explore management assesses whether there are any indicators of the area and (ii) claim expiration dates. impairment related to resource properties. Management − Read board minutes and obtained budget approvals applies judgment in determining whether indicators of to evidence continued and planned substantive impairment exist, including factors such as the period for which expenditures on further exploration and evaluation the Company has the right to explore, whether substantive activities, which included evaluating the results of expenditures on further exploration and evaluation of resource the current year work programs. properties are budgeted and whether results of exploration and evaluation and exploration activities on the resource properties − Assessed whether results of exploration and indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is unlikely to be evaluation activities, or other facts and recovered in full from successful development or by sale. If any circumstances, suggest that the carrying amount such indicator exists, then an impairment test is performed by may not be recoverable, based on evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter management. No indicators of impairment were identified by management as at March 31, 2026. We considered this a key audit matter due to the significance of the resource properties and the judgments made by management in its assessment of indicators of impairment, which have resulted in a high degree of subjectivity in performing procedures related to these judgments applied by management. Other information Management is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. Responsibilities of management and those charged with governance for the consolidated financial statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. • Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. • Plan and perform the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business units within the Company as a basis for forming an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit work performed for purposes of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicabl [Excerpt trimmed for readability. Open the original source for the complete filing or document.]
